For marketplace trust & safety

Marketplace trust & safety, with the operator graph the bans are missing.

Ban a storefront and the operator registers the next one — often the same week, sometimes on your own platform under a name you haven't seen yet. The graph connects storefront brands to the operations behind them, from public records.

Why enforcement feels like whack-a-mole

The unit of abuse is the operator

Storefronts are disposable by design. Enforcement that ends at the storefront resets the game instead of ending it: the operator's other brands keep selling.

Cross-marketplace blindness

The operator banned elsewhere onboards on your platform under a fresh brand with a fresh trademark. Nothing in your own data connects the two; the trademark register does.

Your INFORM data is an untapped signal

The identity disclosures marketplaces collect under the INFORM Act join cleanly to trademark ownership, and that join is what turns a pile of storefront names into a map of operations.

The graph, at platform scale

Operator clusters with evidence

Published clusters name the registered entities operating as one, each connection carrying its evidence, from USPTO assignment records to verified shared identifiers. Never a guess: clusters below the evidence bar don't publish.

Feeds for bulk screening

Nightly verdicts.json and sellers.json feeds carry per-brand ownership verdicts and resolved seller identities: the graph as files your systems can join against.

API at onboarding and review

Per-brand lookups and batch screening with the same facts and receipts, computed from the register at request time.

Questions

How do you decide two storefronts are one operator?

Only from evidence: USPTO assignment records, shared verified identifiers in public filings and disclosures, and machine adjudication above a measured false-positive bar. Connections that don't clear the bar are not published — silence over guessing.

Can we consume this inside our own systems?

Yes. The feeds are bulk JSON refreshed nightly, and the API answers per-brand at request time. Commercial licensing for use inside a product is on the pricing page.

Is a cluster an accusation?

No. A cluster states that public records connect these entities, each with its receipt. Plenty of legitimate companies hold many brands; the graph reports the structure, and the facts stay facts.

Related: For brand-protection counsel · For payments & merchant risk

See an operator file

Run a brand through the free check and follow it to its operator page: entities, marks, and the evidence connecting them.

Josh PigfordWondering if it fits your stack?Text Josh, the founder (279) 240-3865